Last Monday, I announced that I was doing a media experiment:
I will attempt to see how long I can go without discovering who won the recent
election between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, and then report the results. I’ve
been asked some questions regarding this, and I figured I’d answer them here so
everyone can see the answers. Plus, I didn’t really lay out the “rules” last
time, so this might help.
Q.
Are you making a political statement?
A.
No. This is a statement on the immediacy of the news we receive. A lot of this
honestly is born out of the Olympic coverage. We live in a time when where it
was possible to watch any event as it happened. But NBC chose to put on events
at odd times and “spoiled” live events. (Thus really, really destroying what is
meant by the term “spoiler.”) Realistically, this should be the most covered
news story in America, provided Kim Kardashian doesn’t get married again or
tweets a picture of herself in a bikini.
Q.
Does this mean you’re not going to vote?
A.
No. I’ll be voting. That’s my right as an American. Who I’ll be voting for is a
mystery, shrouded in a cloud and if you think you know who I’m voting for, you’re
probably wrong. But I've not actually made up my mind about who I’m voting for,
unless Kim Kardashian tweets another picture of herself in a bikini.
Q.
What are you trying to prove?
A.
I’m not trying to “prove” anything. I’m trying to take a look at the immediacy
in which we want news, and the extent we’ll go to get it. The Presidential
election should be a huge story… the biggest in America, and rightfully so. But
plenty of non-football fans don’t know who won the Superbowl, and that’s pretty
big. If you don’t care about actors then what use are the Oscars? But
President? That’s the leader of us. You should know who he is. I’m going to see
what I have to do to avoid learning his name for as long as possible.
Q.
What do you think you’ll have to do in
order to avoid this?
A.
No Facebook, no radio, no newspapers, no online newspapers, changing my home
screen, no phone, no notifications, no Twitter (which means less tweets of Kim
Kardashian in a bikini), and basically a change in my lifestyle. Bad
Shakespeare itself won’t be given live updates about the news while I’m busy
not figuring this out.
Q.
You have a Twitter account?
A.
Yep. It’s not under Bad Shakespeare, and mostly it’s to follow comedians. But
that has nothing to do with my point.
Q.
So what do you hope to gain from this?
A.
Hopefully, patience and a better understanding of the way media used to work.
Back when media had to take time to reach everyone, there was time for “fact
checkers” to work. People took time to figure out what was going on, and double
checked… well, everything. They didn’t spew out the first thing on their lips
because they wanted to be first, people’s lives be damned. Check out Michael
Keaton in The Paper. Basically, that.
Q.
No, really, who are you voting for?
A.
Obviously, Kim Kardashian in a bikini.
No comments:
Post a Comment